Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 9 de 9
Filter
2.
Medical Journal of Cairo University [The]. 1994; 62 (2): 569-81
in English | IMEMR | ID: emr-33453

ABSTRACT

The effect of a single oral dose of beta-1 blocker [Metoprolol] versus combined alpha- and beta-blocker [Labetalol] was evaluated in two groups of patients: Control [C] normotensive and hypertensive [H] groups with mild to moderate elevation of blood pressure. Each group consisted of 10 subjects. The study comprised monitoring the heart rate [HR] and blood pressure [BP] response to two tests: Hand grip test [HCT] and cold pressor test [CPT]. These tests were performed before and after the drugs on separate sittings. The BP and HR response to HGT before administration of drugs was linear for the two groups, while the CPT showed insignificant rise of HR. The results at rest before and after medications in both groups showed a decrease in HR and BP. It was statistically insignificant in C group only after Labetalol used. In C group Metoprolol was more effective in lowering the pressor response than Labetalol, while in the H group Labetalol was potent in reducing BP, specially during CPT


Subject(s)
Metoprolol/pharmacology , Labetalol/pharmacology , Exercise Test
4.
Arch. venez. farmacol. ter ; 8(2): 103-8, 1989. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: lil-82408

ABSTRACT

En el presente estudio de diseño simple-ciego, placebo-control, cruzado y randomizado, evaluamos la respuesta tensional y las modificaciones hemodinámicas causadas por el tratamiento oral y durante dos semanas con un agente bloqueador beta-adrenérgico selectivo con efecto simpático-mimético intríseco (Acebutolol, 400 mg/día) o con un agente bloqueador alfa y beta-adrenérgico (Labetalol, 400 mg/día). A tal efecto, 25 pacientes hipertensos leves fueron sometidos a ejercicio isométrico al 30% de su capacidad máxima y a ejercicio dinámico hasta un máximo de 75W, bajo monitoreo con electrograma de impedancia y durante ciclos de tratamiento con placebo, Acebutolol o Labetalol en forma cruzada, La efectividad terapéutica de ambas drogas fue similar en reposo, pero el Labetalol indujo una menor respuesta hipertensiva al ejercicio isométrico que el Acebutolol, la cual parece deberse a un menor incremento de las resistencias periféricas. Durante el ejercicio dinámico se observó una atención de la respuesta hipertensiva similar con ambos medicamentos; el labetalol, sin embargo, permitió un incremento del gasto cardíaco mayor que el tratamiento con Acebutolol. Estos efectos diferenciales del Labetalol se atribuyen a su efecto bloqueador alfa-adrenérgico, y lo hacen particularmente útil en pacientes hipertensos con actividad física moderada o intensa


Subject(s)
Adult , Middle Aged , Humans , Male , Female , Acebutolol/pharmacology , Exercise/drug effects , Labetalol/pharmacology
7.
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol ; 1979 Jan-Mar; 23(1): 39-43
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-107298

ABSTRACT

Labetalol, an alpha- and beta- adrenoceptor antagonist was investigated for its central nervous system effects in rats and mice. A marked reduction in the spontaneous motor activity with no concomittant muscle weakness was produced. The drug caused closure of eyelids in rats. Labetalol caused hypothermia and prolonged the pentobarbitone-induced hyposis. In animals trained for conditioned avoidance response the drug blocked the SCR in all the animals and CAR in a few number of animals. The drug did not protect the animals against electroshock convulsions. From the results it appears that labetalol is a central nervous system depressant.


Subject(s)
Animals , Avoidance Learning/drug effects , Body Temperature/drug effects , Central Nervous System/drug effects , Conditioning, Operant/drug effects , Depression, Chemical , Drug Synergism , Ethanolamines/pharmacology , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Labetalol/pharmacology , Male , Mice , Motor Activity/drug effects , Pentobarbital/pharmacology , Rats , Seizures/prevention & control
9.
Indian J Exp Biol ; 1978 Oct; 16(10): 1091-2
Article in English | IMSEAR | ID: sea-57370
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL